Naumis,+Mike+-+Anlysis+and+Reflection

I liked this project because it was unique. Instead of just doing some research and handing in a paper on it, everyone was responsible for taking care of the website and editing other peoples work as well as doing their own. There was a lot of freedom in this project. There were many different topics for us to choose from, and there was room for adding to or changing other people’s work or other parts of the website. Overall, this was a good project because it was unique, it gave us a lot of freedom, and there was a lot more to it than just the research.

My Contributions
The first thing I did on this site was edit the navigation bar (on the left side) for the first time. I added the “Home” link. Since then many other links have been added by other users. Next, I added summaries for ch 6 and ch 11 in our textbook as review for the test. These can be found under the test notes and questions link. Then I added a page on Mozilla Firefox for the project. I later added another shorter page on CATA, from the presentation in our second lecture. I also added the “Who is Mike Jones” page, not so much for the marks but just for fun. Throughout all this I also edited and fixed a few small errors on a few pages. I added a section to the “WiFi” page as well on “WiFi internet access in cities”.

Suggestions
Although I didn’t have any problems myself (and I don’t know if anyone else did), there is room for conflict and other problems in this project. Since everyone is free to post anything at any time, there can be conflicts between 2 or more people who want to post the same topic at the same time. I don’t think that was a problem this time, but if it does become a problem then it should be covered in the outline for next time. Also, this freedom may also create an organizational problem. I noticed that our website was actually organized and maintained really well. But, again, if it becomes a problem it may be a good idea to set a few small guidelines on the structure of the site.